Week 12: Community Relations

And....I'm back to blogging! Last week, our team submitted a case memo about the Rosewood hotel group that challenged my Excel, math, and critical thinking skills. I think I was finally able to get a grasp on the direction I thought the company should go in--let's hope I was somewhat on target!

This week we are focusing more on on the community relations aspect of marketing. I have to admit, this is more in my area of expertise. As a former publicist and social media specialist (and now a publicity supervisor), I use social media daily in order to garner attention for our authors.

That said:

• Does your firm use social media in its communications effort? How?  Is it effective?

We use social media in author marketing (to promote their personal brand and their books) and at a corporate level (in order to promote our brands and our publishing product). On the author marketing level, social media has been very effective for our authors. We are able to garner book reviews, book recommendations, book sales, brand advocates, awareness and more during our social media campaigns in order to build a platform for our authors. On the corporate level, social media has been great on a customer service level, by answering questions authors have and giving them a platform to share their good experiences with other potential authors.

• What types of messages do you think work best in Social media? Why?

We get the best response from posts that are informative or fun/personal. Social media is all about giving/building relationships first before seeing results--followers respond best to incentives. If you provide something of value, whether that be in the form of information, comments or a tangible product, a person is more likely to advocate on your behalf. Like most relationships, interacting via social media shows an investment in your customers and target audience (one that must be nurtured).

• Will social media make other Marketing Communication forms obsolete?

I don't believe that social media will make other forms of marketing communications obsolete (because people consume media in various ways and in various places still). However, as we've seen already, social media will become an even larger component of that marketing communications mix. It will also be dependent on the target audience that you'd like to reach--for products targeting a younger demographic, social media lends itself as an obvious resource.

Week 10: Brand Valuation

1. What makes a brand valuable?

A brand is valuable in an intangible asset. It contains the feelings and thoughts of a target audience (and all consumers) about your company and/or your products. It's what makes your product unique, and helps your product stand out among other competition--because, all brands are different, and the way that consumers feel about different brands also varies. Consumers make purchasing decisions based on brands and their feelings about brands, so the way your brand is viewed should always be considered when developing any plan for the company.

1. What do brands do.  How do they create value?

A brand creates value in multiple ways. A brand creates value from the start simply by participating in business operations. What's important is consistency from beginning to end--that will build trust and a positive brand image among consumers. The core idea or mission statement behind a brand must not only be created but implemented in all aspects of the company and its dealings with the public (Beware: Actions speak louder than words!).

     1. What are some of your most favorite brands?  Why?


My favorite brands include Victoria's Secret (as mentioned before), Rock Bottom Brewery, Scotty's Brewhouse, and Carnival Cruise lines (even after the recent disasters). Part of that is my experience with the quality of the product, consistency, and most importantly the incentives these brands offer. All offer rewards to frequent or returning customers, offering a VIP experience for an investment in the company.

1. Should Brands be on the balance sheet?  Why?  Why not?

Brands should be on the balance sheet--while it may be harder to calculate the value of a brand, a brand can influence a purchasing decision. A brand with little to no klout would have less value to consumers starting out.

Week 9: Culinarian Cookware Case

The Culinarian Cookware case is interesting in terms of considering all aspects of price and promotion:

1. Was the previous promotion effective in achieving the goals specified in the case.  Most importantly was it profitable? 

Perhaps the promotion did appease the trade and "stimulate excitement," with good sales numbers and customers admitting that the promotional price persuaded them to buy the cookware. However, the promotion was not profitable, with a projected loss of $469,489 and $99,332. While the company was able to save almost $40,000 on inventory costs, that does not make up for the amount of money that was considered lost on efforts. 

1. What aspects of the promotion worked best and which were less successful?

The price promotion was only implemented by 50% of the stores, while in other promotions the stores pocketed the sales difference. Offering a gift incentive (especially during gift months) worked well for Culinarian--and retained the image of high-end cookware--but not for the stores who had to shelve the extra gift sets.

1. Should Culinarian run a promotion prospectively?  Why or why not?

In order to maintain it's image as quality, high-end cookware (one of the company's overarching goals), a promotion--based on past instances---would not be worth the risk of loss associated with a promotion. It could harm the image, and would not boost sales enough to remain profitable.

Week 8: Pricing, Channels and IMC (VS)

1. Reflect on a firm or product you like which you believe is highly effective in bringing all the elements of the Mix together to create beautiful symphony for their consumers.

I'm ashamed to say it (and possibly shouldn't on a public Kelley marketing class blog), but I am a bit obsessed with Victoria's Secret. I know as a company have had their ups and downs, but just one glance at my bank account and you'll see their success (and I'm no easy sell). I think Victoria's Secret as a company utilizes their product, price, placement and promotion in a beautiful, burlesque-inspired symphony.

1. Who are the target audience for the company's market offerings? 

The target audience for Victoria's Secret would be women, likely professional women with disposable income (ages 22-45). They also have an offshoot, "Pink" that caters to a more youthful audience of high school and college women (age 14-22).

1. What are the tangible products the company offers?

Boudoir: Bras (both practical and impractible), underwear, lingerie, intimates
Clothing: Business casual, cruisewear, dresswear, swimwear (upscale)
Beauty: Makeup, perfume, hair products, lotions

1. How does the company utilize price, and place to enhance the value of its offerings and why do you think their choice works well together?

What's wonderful about bras is that every woman needs one (or feels she needs one, due to our culture). Every woman has different needs when it comes to bras--bras that enhance, bras to tone down, bras to support, bras for looks and bras for comfort. But, not every department-store brand bra will satisfy those needs.

That's where Victoria's Secret comes in. Their sleek, sophisticated, black-and-pink style resonates with many women--women who will pay the extra money (a higher price) for the quality comfort, design, and look of a Victoria's Secret brand name bra.

However, Victoria's Secret offers all things "sexy" and "womanly," and once they get you in the door for a product that might be considered necessary (a bra), you must also walk through rooms showcasing lingerie, clothing, and beauty products that also help (or are perceived to help) enhance the final image: A woman who looks good, smells good, and is wearing clothes that give her confidence.

Without fail, I walk into a Victoria's Secret store expecting to spend money on only what I need (a bra, a T-shirt, etc.) and end up walking out spending more than I expected. Victoria's Secret offers knows that if they can get customers in the door (with coupons and "free panty" incentives), they can increase the dollar amount on purchases.

The company also offers a catologue and website that includes more clothing and swimwear options, offering ease of use for busy women on the go.

1. Does the company have a unique approach to communications with their target audience?  How is the approach well suited to the other elements of their mix? 

Victoria's Secret uses an interesting approach to communication and promotion, including:

• Creative emails/mailers: Fun, flirty promotional taglines
• Events: Events for "VIP" customers with special discounts
• VS card (pink and black): The Victoria's Secret Angels card, first in pink and then in black (the color for luxury) once a cardholder hits VIP status
• "Angel rewards": A point system for Angel Card holders that offers birthday discounts and coupon books
• Special offers: Semi-annual sales, free totes with purchases 
• Free product incentives/coupons
• Secret Rewards: "Secret" amounts of next purchases when you purchase an item

All of these are well-suited for the target audience of women and for the "unique to you" bra options Victoria's Secret offers. These communications make Victoria's Secret customers feel special, sexy, and fun--likely, the messaging strategy the company has always had in mind. With this in mind, I think they have been quit successful!

The Cleopatra Colgate-Palmolive Case

1. What are the major issues in the Cleo Case from the perspective of the product, and pricing?   ----The major issues in the Cleo Case were that the product was priced at a wrong price, at a price that did not match the perceived benefit and value of the product (as compared to other brands and the saturated soap market).
2. Are there issues with the market research? ----The marketing group at Palmolive likely underestimated the public's familiarity and preference for other soap brands. When conducting marketing research, the company focused on the success they had with the smaller, more elite group rather than the group that would have made the product a success.
3. What organizational issues come in to play in the case?  Who are the players and how do their positions in the company impact the market entry?  ----The marketing group made the assumption that since the French launch did so well, that it would be the same in the French Canadian market. There was likely pressure to enter the U.S. market, depending on proven success in the North American market. This would have been a significant success for those who wanted to move up the corporate ladder.
4. Did they make the right choice?  Why or Why not?---From a marketing perspective, their linear thinking made sense (differentiating themselves from the market, comparing two similar-and yet different--countries). In a vacuum, it would stand to reason that a product priced at a luxury price successfully would do well in another market, but there are other internal and external considerations that the company didn't focus on.
5. Are companies today any better than Colgate 20 years ago or do they still make some of the same mistakes? ---Companies, under even more intense pressure to perform in markets that are ultra-competitive, sometimes do make the same mistakes. Perhaps it lies in the factor of limited time(and therefore limited market research), or in a limited understanding of all of the factors that could make or break a product launch.

Week 7: Pricing Strategy

This week, we delved more into pricing strategy (with the reading of Chapter 7, the Palmolive-Colgate Case, and a Camtasia review of pricing influences). Several different factors go into pricing--of course, you have to consider the input costs (costs of production of the product), and whether or not you want to use a fixed (such as McDonald's dollar menu) or dynamic price methodology. You will have to consider industry demands, competition, and both external and internal factors (such as luxury status, etc.).

But most importantly, you have to consider the perceived value and benefits from a consumer's vantage. As the text suggests, customers "act on the basis of their perceptions of price and benefits," and their resulting purchases set the demand for a good or service. It's a delicate balance of matching the perception of benefits with what they might consider a "fair" price.  In order to "enhance value," a marketer will have to determine whether a company will add to perceived benefits or reduce the perceived price.

Pricing structure will change with the introduction of competitors, new products, etc. I drive a Mazda 626, for example. The Kelley Blue Book Value of my vehicle has dropped dramatically in the past few years, while the Blue Book Value for my brother's Honda Civic has dropped only slightly. This difference in value perception is in part due to the perceived benefits of the Honda Civic: Good gas mileage, safety, reliability, and sturdier engines. Due to Honda's good track record, they have earned a reputation of building quality, economical, safe, reliable vehicles--thus, their perceived value is higher (and pricing remains stable).

Similarly, Apple is able to price their products at a much higher cost due to their products' perceived value and the perceived benefits to Apple consumers. Therefore, while comparable products exist (the market is now saturated with tablets, for example) Apple is able to price their products at a much higher cost.

Week 6: Product Development Management

This week, we are learning different methods of developing products. This week, we read Chapter 6, the Colgate-Palmolive/Cleopatra case, "Apple and Innovation," and watched two videos (Rory Sutherland and David Bell) as well as two Camtasia presentations.

We also had a quiz and Ideation project (due tomorrow)--whew!

Learning Questions:

1. Consider various "products" you use. Can you think of the various levels of this product?

iPhone: This iPhone a phone (Actual product), but also provides me with the ability to call, surf the internet, or take photos (Core benefits). Having the iPhone means being able to sync and access the iTunes store, the iCloud and applications (Augmented products). Having an iPhone is also sometimes seen as a status symbol.

My Car: My Mazda is a car (Actual product), but provides me with the ability to travel to destinations, listen to music, and transport passengers (Core benefits). Augmented products associated with the car could include satellite radio and OnStar.

1. Products are tools (drill) that provide consumer benefits. If the a better tool comes along that provides the same core benefit but is easier to get, cheaper, or more fun then the old tool will be obsolete. Can you think of cases where products have become obsolete?
   

The typewriter gave way to the computer processor, the rotary phone gave way to dial versions (and then cell phones), computer storage floppy disks gave way to portable drives and CD-Roms, music records gave way to tapes (and then CDs/mp3s), and the list goes on. All offer the same core benefits: Recording written words, dialing/calling other people, storing data, and listening to recorded music. However, over time the preferences changed to fit the needs/wants of consumers (to make things easier/smaller, etc.).

1. Considering the diagram of page 102 of your text how do you think product development has been affected by shorter product lifecycles? Has technology affected product development?
   

I can see how technology can prompt shorter product lifecycles--which leaves limited time to refine and test the product (particularly in the market testing phase). This could result in products that are cheaper but sub-par. However, in our "disposable" technological culture, bringing products to market quickly is a necessity if a company wants to make a mark.